MEDINA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

181

33%

LEVEL 2

170

31%

LEVEL 3

121

22%

LEVEL 4

70

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

139

30%

LEVEL 2

163

35%

LEVEL 3

107

23%

LEVEL 4

53

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

90

33%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

67

30%

LEVEL 2

87

39%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

91

33%

LEVEL 2

69

25%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

72

30%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

12

28%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

14

40%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

160
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

127

31%

LEVEL 2

129

31%

LEVEL 3

101

24%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

96

26%

LEVEL 2

126

34%

LEVEL 3

95

26%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

19

54%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

14

67%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

20

48%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

14

40%

LEVEL 2

15

43%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

122

26%

LEVEL 2

159

34%

LEVEL 3

118

25%

LEVEL 4

70

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

95

23%

LEVEL 2

153

38%

LEVEL 3

104

26%

LEVEL 4

53

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

59

81%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

44

77%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

188
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

171

33%

LEVEL 2

167

32%

LEVEL 3

119

23%

LEVEL 4

69

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

159
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

132

29%

LEVEL 2

161

36%

LEVEL 3

106

23%

LEVEL 4

53

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

43

21%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

41

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

38

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

138

41%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

70

21%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

104

38%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

56

20%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

188
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

173

33%

LEVEL 2

169

32%

LEVEL 3

120

23%

LEVEL 4

68

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

159
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

132

29%

LEVEL 2

159

35%

LEVEL 3

106

24%

LEVEL 4

53

12%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

190
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

174

33%

LEVEL 2

169

32%

LEVEL 3

120

23%

LEVEL 4

70

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.