Skip to Content
Main content

ATTICA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

114

24%

LEVEL 2

140

30%

LEVEL 3

157

33%

LEVEL 4

61

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

91

20%

LEVEL 2

142

31%

LEVEL 3

151

33%

LEVEL 4

69

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

119
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

54

23%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

87

36%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

77

34%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

60

26%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

51

22%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

74

33%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

208
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

106

24%

LEVEL 2

133

30%

LEVEL 3

148

33%

LEVEL 4

60

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

211
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

85

20%

LEVEL 2

133

31%

LEVEL 3

142

33%

LEVEL 4

69

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

59

15%

LEVEL 2

121

31%

LEVEL 3

153

39%

LEVEL 4

60

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

39

10%

LEVEL 2

121

32%

LEVEL 3

146

39%

LEVEL 4

67

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

55

70%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

52

65%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

44

16%

LEVEL 2

78

28%

LEVEL 3

109

39%

LEVEL 4

45

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

104

38%

LEVEL 4

55

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

70

36%

LEVEL 2

62

32%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

56

31%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

216
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

108

23%

LEVEL 2

137

30%

LEVEL 3

155

34%

LEVEL 4

61

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.