Skip to Content
Main content

CHITTENANGO CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

374
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 692

LEVEL 1

137

20%

LEVEL 2

181

26%

LEVEL 3

207

30%

LEVEL 4

167

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

362
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 658

LEVEL 1

128

19%

LEVEL 2

168

26%

LEVEL 3

199

30%

LEVEL 4

163

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

178
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

60

18%

LEVEL 2

91

28%

LEVEL 3

93

28%

LEVEL 4

85

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

61

19%

LEVEL 2

83

26%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

82

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

196
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

77

21%

LEVEL 2

90

25%

LEVEL 3

114

31%

LEVEL 4

82

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

181
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

67

20%

LEVEL 2

85

26%

LEVEL 3

100

30%

LEVEL 4

81

24%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

7

30%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

10

36%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

350
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

123

19%

LEVEL 2

166

26%

LEVEL 3

194

30%

LEVEL 4

156

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

335
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

116

19%

LEVEL 2

148

25%

LEVEL 3

183

31%

LEVEL 4

152

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

357
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

80

13%

LEVEL 2

157

26%

LEVEL 3

194

33%

LEVEL 4

163

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

346
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 562

LEVEL 1

70

12%

LEVEL 2

146

26%

LEVEL 3

186

33%

LEVEL 4

160

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

57

58%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

58

60%

LEVEL 2

22

23%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

266
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

54

13%

LEVEL 2

103

24%

LEVEL 3

136

32%

LEVEL 4

130

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

261
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

45

11%

LEVEL 2

93

23%

LEVEL 3

131

33%

LEVEL 4

130

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

83

31%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

83

32%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

68

26%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

371
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 683

LEVEL 1

133

19%

LEVEL 2

179

26%

LEVEL 3

205

30%

LEVEL 4

166

24%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

358
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 653

LEVEL 1

127

19%

LEVEL 2

168

26%

LEVEL 3

196

30%

LEVEL 4

162

25%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.