Skip to Content
Main content

ONEIDA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

146

28%

LEVEL 2

123

24%

LEVEL 3

149

29%

LEVEL 4

96

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 586

LEVEL 1

169

29%

LEVEL 2

165

28%

LEVEL 3

170

29%

LEVEL 4

82

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

75

28%

LEVEL 2

67

25%

LEVEL 3

79

30%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

83

26%

LEVEL 2

92

29%

LEVEL 3

97

31%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

71

29%

LEVEL 2

56

23%

LEVEL 3

70

28%

LEVEL 4

50

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

86

32%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

11

39%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

9
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

12

44%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

216
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

118

27%

LEVEL 2

104

24%

LEVEL 3

127

29%

LEVEL 4

89

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

221
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

142

28%

LEVEL 2

143

28%

LEVEL 3

149

29%

LEVEL 4

72

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

68

17%

LEVEL 2

104

25%

LEVEL 3

144

35%

LEVEL 4

94

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

246
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

84

18%

LEVEL 2

144

30%

LEVEL 3

164

35%

LEVEL 4

82

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

78

75%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

85

76%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

244
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

142

28%

LEVEL 2

121

24%

LEVEL 3

149

29%

LEVEL 4

95

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

251
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

165

28%

LEVEL 2

165

28%

LEVEL 3

170

29%

LEVEL 4

81

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

38

17%

LEVEL 2

42

19%

LEVEL 3

76

34%

LEVEL 4

67

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

42

16%

LEVEL 2

66

26%

LEVEL 3

96

38%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

108

37%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

73

25%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

127

38%

LEVEL 2

99

30%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

248
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 562

LEVEL 1

156

28%

LEVEL 2

158

28%

LEVEL 3

167

30%

LEVEL 4

81

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

13

54%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.