Skip to Content
Main content

BEAVER RIVER CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

69

20%

LEVEL 2

118

34%

LEVEL 3

109

31%

LEVEL 4

56

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

96

27%

LEVEL 2

137

38%

LEVEL 3

100

28%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

57

33%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

44

25%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

38

21%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

52

28%

LEVEL 2

75

41%

LEVEL 3

46

25%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

67

20%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

107

31%

LEVEL 4

55

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

93

27%

LEVEL 2

132

38%

LEVEL 3

96

28%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

38

13%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

101

35%

LEVEL 4

52

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

50

17%

LEVEL 2

124

42%

LEVEL 3

92

31%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

31

51%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

46

69%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

40

23%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

68

37%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

56

30%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

162
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

117

34%

LEVEL 3

106

31%

LEVEL 4

56

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.