SOUTH LEWIS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

117

28%

LEVEL 2

123

29%

LEVEL 3

111

26%

LEVEL 4

69

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

116

27%

LEVEL 2

120

28%

LEVEL 3

122

29%

LEVEL 4

65

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

66

30%

LEVEL 2

69

31%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

59

27%

LEVEL 2

74

33%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

51

26%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

54

27%

LEVEL 4

39

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

57

28%

LEVEL 2

46

23%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

36

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

176
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

111

27%

LEVEL 2

117

29%

LEVEL 3

107

26%

LEVEL 4

69

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

182
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

111

27%

LEVEL 2

112

28%

LEVEL 3

118

29%

LEVEL 4

64

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

104

33%

LEVEL 3

100

32%

LEVEL 4

68

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

51

16%

LEVEL 2

96

30%

LEVEL 3

112

35%

LEVEL 4

62

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

72

70%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

65

64%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

44

33%

LEVEL 4

27

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

33

22%

LEVEL 2

38

25%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

31

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

91

32%

LEVEL 2

85

30%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

83

30%

LEVEL 2

82

30%

LEVEL 3

74

27%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

179
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

114

27%

LEVEL 2

122

29%

LEVEL 3

110

27%

LEVEL 4

69

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

184
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

115

28%

LEVEL 2

118

28%

LEVEL 3

120

29%

LEVEL 4

64

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.