Skip to Content
Main content

LOWVILLE ACADEMY & CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

133

24%

LEVEL 2

148

27%

LEVEL 3

150

28%

LEVEL 4

113

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

277
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

130

24%

LEVEL 2

132

24%

LEVEL 3

155

29%

LEVEL 4

122

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

64

25%

LEVEL 2

64

25%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

58

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

56

22%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

63

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

69

24%

LEVEL 2

84

29%

LEVEL 3

84

29%

LEVEL 4

55

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

74

26%

LEVEL 2

65

23%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

59

21%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

253
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

122

24%

LEVEL 2

140

27%

LEVEL 3

146

28%

LEVEL 4

107

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

263
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

116

23%

LEVEL 2

122

24%

LEVEL 3

147

29%

LEVEL 4

116

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

75

16%

LEVEL 2

116

25%

LEVEL 3

146

32%

LEVEL 4

122

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

55

69%

LEVEL 2

16

20%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

49

17%

LEVEL 2

71

24%

LEVEL 3

87

30%

LEVEL 4

85

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

56

19%

LEVEL 2

68

23%

LEVEL 3

86

29%

LEVEL 4

89

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

84

33%

LEVEL 2

77

31%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

74

31%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

69

29%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

252
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

130

25%

LEVEL 2

139

27%

LEVEL 3

143

27%

LEVEL 4

109

21%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

270
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

125

24%

LEVEL 2

129

25%

LEVEL 3

150

29%

LEVEL 4

120

23%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.