Skip to Content
Main content

LOWVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

61

22%

LEVEL 2

59

22%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

71

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

68

26%

LEVEL 3

87

33%

LEVEL 4

60

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

28

23%

LEVEL 2

24

20%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

35

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

40

31%

LEVEL 4

34

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

33

22%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

36

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

29

21%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

47

34%

LEVEL 4

26

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

56

22%

LEVEL 2

55

22%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

65

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

45

18%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

82

33%

LEVEL 4

56

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

82

36%

LEVEL 4

60

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

21

55%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

32

20%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

57

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

47

33%

LEVEL 4

43

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

40

35%

LEVEL 2

27

24%

LEVEL 3

33

29%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

33

26%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

40

32%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

146
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

58

22%

LEVEL 2

56

22%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

69

27%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

143
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

50

19%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

59

23%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.