CASE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

200

49%

LEVEL 2

110

27%

LEVEL 3

76

19%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

200

45%

LEVEL 2

136

30%

LEVEL 3

82

18%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

100

50%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

88

42%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

100

48%

LEVEL 2

53

26%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

112

47%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

13

37%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

145

50%

LEVEL 2

75

26%

LEVEL 3

53

18%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

143

46%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

22

63%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

24

57%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

18

39%

LEVEL 2

17

37%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

19

40%

LEVEL 2

17

36%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

125

39%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

129

36%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

75

83%

LEVEL 2

11

12%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

71

77%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

99
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

196

49%

LEVEL 2

109

27%

LEVEL 3

76

19%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

110
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

196

44%

LEVEL 2

136

31%

LEVEL 3

80

18%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

16

32%

LEVEL 2

20

40%

LEVEL 3

14

28%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

28

36%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

184

51%

LEVEL 2

90

25%

LEVEL 3

62

17%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

172

46%

LEVEL 2

111

30%

LEVEL 3

63

17%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

87
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

187

51%

LEVEL 2

95

26%

LEVEL 3

68

18%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

95
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

189

46%

LEVEL 2

129

31%

LEVEL 3

69

17%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

12
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

13

33%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

17
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

13

37%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.