HERKIMER CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

173

39%

LEVEL 2

124

28%

LEVEL 3

106

24%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

184

37%

LEVEL 2

150

30%

LEVEL 3

127

25%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

94

43%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

99

39%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

79

36%

LEVEL 2

60

27%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

85

34%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

62

25%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

146

37%

LEVEL 2

112

29%

LEVEL 3

100

26%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

158

35%

LEVEL 2

139

31%

LEVEL 3

118

26%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

107

29%

LEVEL 2

118

32%

LEVEL 3

105

29%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

115

27%

LEVEL 2

140

33%

LEVEL 3

126

30%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

66

90%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

69

86%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

141
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

170

39%

LEVEL 2

123

28%

LEVEL 3

106

24%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

41

25%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

41

25%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

132

48%

LEVEL 2

71

26%

LEVEL 3

55

20%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

143

43%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.