GREGORY B JARVIS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

133

30%

LEVEL 2

142

32%

LEVEL 3

106

24%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

224

37%

LEVEL 2

160

26%

LEVEL 3

142

23%

LEVEL 4

81

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

62

28%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

53

24%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

103

35%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

71

33%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

121

38%

LEVEL 2

79

25%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

152
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

122

30%

LEVEL 2

129

32%

LEVEL 3

99

25%

LEVEL 4

53

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

214
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

204

36%

LEVEL 2

148

26%

LEVEL 3

137

24%

LEVEL 4

77

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

85

23%

LEVEL 2

131

35%

LEVEL 3

104

28%

LEVEL 4

56

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

137

28%

LEVEL 2

141

28%

LEVEL 3

138

28%

LEVEL 4

80

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

48

79%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

87

78%

LEVEL 2

19

17%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

47

34%

LEVEL 3

44

32%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

50

24%

LEVEL 2

64

30%

LEVEL 3

58

28%

LEVEL 4

38

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

107

36%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

174

44%

LEVEL 2

96

24%

LEVEL 3

84

21%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

222
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 600

LEVEL 1

219

37%

LEVEL 2

159

27%

LEVEL 3

141

24%

LEVEL 4

81

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.