COXSACKIE-ATHENS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

137

34%

LEVEL 2

122

30%

LEVEL 3

106

26%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

183

34%

LEVEL 2

177

33%

LEVEL 3

126

24%

LEVEL 4

49

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

63

33%

LEVEL 2

55

29%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

79

32%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

74

34%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

104

36%

LEVEL 2

88

31%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

102

31%

LEVEL 2

100

30%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

144

32%

LEVEL 2

154

34%

LEVEL 3

113

25%

LEVEL 4

46

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

19

51%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

21

51%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

97

27%

LEVEL 2

116

32%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

128

27%

LEVEL 2

171

36%

LEVEL 3

124

26%

LEVEL 4

49

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

40

83%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

55

87%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

58

26%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

87

26%

LEVEL 2

109

33%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

79

43%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

96

48%

LEVEL 2

68

34%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

147
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

134

34%

LEVEL 2

119

30%

LEVEL 3

106

27%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

175
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

180

34%

LEVEL 2

175

33%

LEVEL 3

126

24%

LEVEL 4

49

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.