Skip to Content
Main content

CATSKILL CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 666

LEVEL 1

228

34%

LEVEL 2

177

27%

LEVEL 3

151

23%

LEVEL 4

110

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

178

28%

LEVEL 2

167

26%

LEVEL 3

174

27%

LEVEL 4

124

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

102

32%

LEVEL 2

96

30%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

86

27%

LEVEL 2

93

29%

LEVEL 3

82

26%

LEVEL 4

58

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

126

36%

LEVEL 2

81

23%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

92

28%

LEVEL 2

74

23%

LEVEL 3

92

28%

LEVEL 4

66

20%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

24
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

28

41%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

27
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

33

42%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

202
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

131

29%

LEVEL 2

121

27%

LEVEL 3

110

24%

LEVEL 4

92

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

230
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

94

22%

LEVEL 2

104

24%

LEVEL 3

130

30%

LEVEL 4

100

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

44

69%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

26

53%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

24

34%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

23

28%

LEVEL 2

30

37%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

254
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

129

24%

LEVEL 2

162

30%

LEVEL 3

144

26%

LEVEL 4

110

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

292
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

98

18%

LEVEL 2

151

28%

LEVEL 3

170

31%

LEVEL 4

122

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

99

82%

LEVEL 2

15

12%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

80

78%

LEVEL 2

16

16%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

254
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 648

LEVEL 1

223

34%

LEVEL 2

171

26%

LEVEL 3

148

23%

LEVEL 4

106

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

287
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 619

LEVEL 1

172

28%

LEVEL 2

160

26%

LEVEL 3

164

26%

LEVEL 4

123

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

39

18%

LEVEL 2

53

25%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

63

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

60

23%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

80

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

189

42%

LEVEL 2

124

27%

LEVEL 3

92

20%

LEVEL 4

47

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

139

36%

LEVEL 2

107

28%

LEVEL 3

97

25%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

261
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 657

LEVEL 1

221

34%

LEVEL 2

175

27%

LEVEL 3

151

23%

LEVEL 4

110

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.