Skip to Content
Main content

CAIRO-DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

114

48%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

102

43%

LEVEL 2

56

24%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

57

44%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

55

46%

LEVEL 2

24

20%

LEVEL 3

24

20%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

57

52%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

47

40%

LEVEL 2

32

27%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

96

48%

LEVEL 2

52

26%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

87

43%

LEVEL 2

50

25%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

11

52%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

91

43%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

83

40%

LEVEL 2

48

23%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

23

77%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

19

63%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

52

46%

LEVEL 2

27

24%

LEVEL 3

19

17%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

34

32%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

62

49%

LEVEL 2

37

29%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

68

52%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

61
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

110

47%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

79
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

99

42%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.