ATHENA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

88

25%

LEVEL 2

115

33%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

60

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

143

33%

LEVEL 2

105

25%

LEVEL 3

112

26%

LEVEL 4

68

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

43

23%

LEVEL 2

66

36%

LEVEL 3

46

25%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

60

30%

LEVEL 2

52

26%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

35

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

30

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

83

37%

LEVEL 2

53

24%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

9

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

35

16%

LEVEL 2

79

36%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

43

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

129
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

64

24%

LEVEL 2

69

26%

LEVEL 3

77

29%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

34

60%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

41

62%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

12

33%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

28

47%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

59

19%

LEVEL 2

110

35%

LEVEL 3

84

27%

LEVEL 4

58

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

88

24%

LEVEL 2

99

27%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

66

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

29

74%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

55

86%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

179
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

137

33%

LEVEL 2

98

24%

LEVEL 3

111

27%

LEVEL 4

68

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

66

33%

LEVEL 4

48

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

48

21%

LEVEL 3

80

35%

LEVEL 4

57

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

63

43%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

101

50%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.