Skip to Content
Main content

CRAIG HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

49

27%

LEVEL 2

47

26%

LEVEL 3

58

32%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

78

33%

LEVEL 2

70

29%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

25

27%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

28

31%

LEVEL 4

14

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

35

33%

LEVEL 2

33

31%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

24

26%

LEVEL 2

23

25%

LEVEL 3

30

33%

LEVEL 4

14

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

43

32%

LEVEL 2

37

27%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

5

21%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

24

24%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

32

32%

LEVEL 4

22

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

30

24%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

21

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

13

39%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

16

43%

LEVEL 2

15

41%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

25

53%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

43

25%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

58

33%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

56

26%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

34

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

22

81%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

85
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

42

25%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

57

33%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

91
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

66

29%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

12

80%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

13

15%

LEVEL 2

19

21%

LEVEL 3

35

39%

LEVEL 4

22

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

32

32%

LEVEL 4

24

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

36

39%

LEVEL 2

28

30%

LEVEL 3

23

25%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

65

47%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.