Skip to Content
Main content

BROADALBIN-PERTH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

134

24%

LEVEL 2

165

29%

LEVEL 3

162

29%

LEVEL 4

103

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

318
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 658

LEVEL 1

152

23%

LEVEL 2

188

29%

LEVEL 3

193

29%

LEVEL 4

125

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

71

27%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

70

27%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

69

23%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

101

33%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

147
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

63

21%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

92

30%

LEVEL 4

55

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

173
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

83

23%

LEVEL 2

99

28%

LEVEL 3

92

26%

LEVEL 4

81

23%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

254
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

126

23%

LEVEL 2

161

30%

LEVEL 3

156

29%

LEVEL 4

98

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

310
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

141

22%

LEVEL 2

179

28%

LEVEL 3

189

30%

LEVEL 4

121

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

95

19%

LEVEL 2

151

30%

LEVEL 3

158

31%

LEVEL 4

102

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

104

18%

LEVEL 2

175

30%

LEVEL 3

187

32%

LEVEL 4

123

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

39

67%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

48

70%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

173
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

40

13%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

104

34%

LEVEL 4

69

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

223
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

40

11%

LEVEL 2

101

28%

LEVEL 3

134

37%

LEVEL 4

89

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

94

36%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

58

22%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

112

38%

LEVEL 2

87

30%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.