MAYFIELD CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

90

27%

LEVEL 2

86

26%

LEVEL 3

95

28%

LEVEL 4

65

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

107

27%

LEVEL 2

118

29%

LEVEL 3

108

27%

LEVEL 4

70

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

42

26%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

32

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

40

23%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

41

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

62

30%

LEVEL 2

55

27%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

38

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

152
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

85

26%

LEVEL 2

84

26%

LEVEL 3

91

28%

LEVEL 4

61

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

168
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

98

26%

LEVEL 2

111

29%

LEVEL 3

104

28%

LEVEL 4

64

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

56

20%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

63

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

71

20%

LEVEL 2

108

31%

LEVEL 3

104

30%

LEVEL 4

68

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

34

62%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

36

69%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

40

24%

LEVEL 3

56

33%

LEVEL 4

41

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

47

26%

LEVEL 3

59

33%

LEVEL 4

39

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

57

34%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

72

32%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

158
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

89

27%

LEVEL 2

84

25%

LEVEL 3

93

28%

LEVEL 4

65

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

178
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

101

26%

LEVEL 2

116

29%

LEVEL 3

108

27%

LEVEL 4

70

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.