GLOVERSVILLE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,085

LEVEL 1

561

52%

LEVEL 2

301

28%

LEVEL 3

171

16%

LEVEL 4

52

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

254
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,110

LEVEL 1

520

47%

LEVEL 2

336

30%

LEVEL 3

185

17%

LEVEL 4

69

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

278

53%

LEVEL 2

145

28%

LEVEL 3

83

16%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

256

46%

LEVEL 2

183

33%

LEVEL 3

79

14%

LEVEL 4

34

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

283

51%

LEVEL 2

156

28%

LEVEL 3

88

16%

LEVEL 4

32

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

264

47%

LEVEL 2

153

27%

LEVEL 3

106

19%

LEVEL 4

35

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

32

45%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

34

41%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

14

17%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

176
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 884

LEVEL 1

457

52%

LEVEL 2

251

28%

LEVEL 3

131

15%

LEVEL 4

45

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

202
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 876

LEVEL 1

409

47%

LEVEL 2

265

30%

LEVEL 3

146

17%

LEVEL 4

56

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

29

62%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

41

53%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

47

48%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 892

LEVEL 1

392

44%

LEVEL 2

286

32%

LEVEL 3

162

18%

LEVEL 4

52

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 908

LEVEL 1

350

39%

LEVEL 2

313

34%

LEVEL 3

176

19%

LEVEL 4

69

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

169

88%

LEVEL 2

15

8%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

170

84%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

9

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

222
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,080

LEVEL 1

557

52%

LEVEL 2

301

28%

LEVEL 3

171

16%

LEVEL 4

51

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

179

42%

LEVEL 2

127

30%

LEVEL 3

91

21%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

115

34%

LEVEL 2

108

32%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 656

LEVEL 1

382

58%

LEVEL 2

174

27%

LEVEL 3

80

12%

LEVEL 4

20

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 774

LEVEL 1

405

52%

LEVEL 2

228

29%

LEVEL 3

109

14%

LEVEL 4

32

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

251
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,105

LEVEL 1

519

47%

LEVEL 2

335

30%

LEVEL 3

182

16%

LEVEL 4

69

6%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

223
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,078

LEVEL 1

556

52%

LEVEL 2

299

28%

LEVEL 3

171

16%

LEVEL 4

52

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

254
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,099

LEVEL 1

510

46%

LEVEL 2

335

30%

LEVEL 3

185

17%

LEVEL 4

69

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

10

91%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.