GLOVERSVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

306

59%

LEVEL 2

141

27%

LEVEL 3

65

13%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

291

52%

LEVEL 2

186

34%

LEVEL 3

63

11%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

150

60%

LEVEL 2

66

26%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

144

50%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

28

10%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

156

59%

LEVEL 2

75

28%

LEVEL 3

33

12%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

147

55%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

35

13%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

16

55%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

14

44%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

255

59%

LEVEL 2

115

27%

LEVEL 3

56

13%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

231

51%

LEVEL 2

157

35%

LEVEL 3

51

11%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

18

64%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

20

74%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

25

60%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

213

51%

LEVEL 2

136

33%

LEVEL 3

64

15%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

195

44%

LEVEL 2

174

39%

LEVEL 3

61

14%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

93

94%

LEVEL 2

5

5%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

96

87%

LEVEL 2

12

11%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

100

49%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

64

37%

LEVEL 2

68

39%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

206

66%

LEVEL 2

73

23%

LEVEL 3

33

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

227

60%

LEVEL 2

118

31%

LEVEL 3

29

8%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

78
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

286

52%

LEVEL 2

185

34%

LEVEL 3

63

11%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.