BRUSHTON-MOIRA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

144

42%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

68

20%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

139

41%

LEVEL 2

105

31%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

69

40%

LEVEL 2

60

35%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

66

39%

LEVEL 2

60

35%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

75

44%

LEVEL 2

49

29%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

73

44%

LEVEL 2

45

27%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

137

42%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

91

33%

LEVEL 2

98

36%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

85

32%

LEVEL 2

95

35%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

53

79%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

54

79%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

30

26%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

33

29%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

25

23%

LEVEL 2

37

35%

LEVEL 3

28

26%

LEVEL 4

17

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

114

50%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

114

50%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

87
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

133

41%

LEVEL 2

101

31%

LEVEL 3

66

21%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

88
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

130

41%

LEVEL 2

96

31%

LEVEL 3

62

20%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

11

52%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

87
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

142

42%

LEVEL 2

107

32%

LEVEL 3

66

20%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

89
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

137

41%

LEVEL 2

105

32%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

89
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

136

41%

LEVEL 2

105

32%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.