BRUSHTON GRADE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

76

34%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

82

38%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

40

36%

LEVEL 2

36

32%

LEVEL 3

24

22%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

41

38%

LEVEL 2

34

32%

LEVEL 3

21

20%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

36

32%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

28

25%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

41

38%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

14

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

80

38%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

50

27%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

51

29%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

26

70%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

31

79%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

14

19%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

26

36%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

15

21%

LEVEL 2

16

22%

LEVEL 3

26

36%

LEVEL 4

16

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

62

41%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

67

47%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

70
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

69

33%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

71
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

75

38%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

72
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

71

33%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.