Skip to Content
Main content

EAST MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

69

30%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

65

29%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

84

28%

LEVEL 2

98

33%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

32

30%

LEVEL 2

35

33%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

30

24%

LEVEL 2

46

37%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

37

30%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

54

32%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

57

31%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

55

24%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

14

74%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

18

62%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

10

63%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

55

27%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

61

30%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

58

23%

LEVEL 2

86

34%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

14

56%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

26

65%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

34

25%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

42

31%

LEVEL 4

25

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

50

29%

LEVEL 4

36

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

35

38%

LEVEL 2

31

34%

LEVEL 3

23

25%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

51

40%

LEVEL 2

47

37%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

112
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

83

29%

LEVEL 2

96

33%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.