BEN FRANKLIN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

112

36%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

75

24%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

108

30%

LEVEL 2

92

26%

LEVEL 3

91

25%

LEVEL 4

67

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

47

32%

LEVEL 2

32

22%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

49

28%

LEVEL 2

46

27%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

37

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

65

40%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

59

32%

LEVEL 2

46

25%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

67

30%

LEVEL 2

59

26%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

60

23%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

55

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

24

67%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

16

53%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

12

44%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

15

44%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

43

19%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

44

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

77

27%

LEVEL 3

88

30%

LEVEL 4

67

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

69

84%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

50

74%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

119
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

103

34%

LEVEL 2

77

26%

LEVEL 3

75

25%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

157
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

92

27%

LEVEL 2

88

26%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

67

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

16

76%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

23

16%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

53

37%

LEVEL 4

37

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

82

51%

LEVEL 2

37

23%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

85

40%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

118
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

108

35%

LEVEL 2

79

26%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

158
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

105

30%

LEVEL 2

88

25%

LEVEL 3

91

26%

LEVEL 4

67

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.