HERBERT HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

138

28%

LEVEL 2

137

28%

LEVEL 3

124

25%

LEVEL 4

96

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

144

28%

LEVEL 2

139

27%

LEVEL 3

151

29%

LEVEL 4

78

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

61

25%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

47

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

64

26%

LEVEL 2

67

27%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

77

30%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

49

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

80

30%

LEVEL 2

72

27%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

11

37%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

83

23%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

100

27%

LEVEL 4

79

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

79

22%

LEVEL 2

95

27%

LEVEL 3

115

33%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

25

66%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

24

51%

LEVEL 2

17

36%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

20

39%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

22

40%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

15

27%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

89

21%

LEVEL 2

119

29%

LEVEL 3

117

28%

LEVEL 4

92

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

93

21%

LEVEL 2

127

29%

LEVEL 3

144

33%

LEVEL 4

75

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

49

63%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

51

70%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

218
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

123

26%

LEVEL 2

133

28%

LEVEL 3

122

26%

LEVEL 4

96

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

225
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

132

27%

LEVEL 2

135

27%

LEVEL 3

147

30%

LEVEL 4

78

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

15

71%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

76

34%

LEVEL 4

62

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

61

25%

LEVEL 3

85

35%

LEVEL 4

57

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

113

42%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

102

38%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

66

25%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

218
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

138

28%

LEVEL 2

133

27%

LEVEL 3

122

25%

LEVEL 4

96

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

229
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

140

28%

LEVEL 2

137

27%

LEVEL 3

151

30%

LEVEL 4

78

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.