ORCHARD PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

316
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

57

10%

LEVEL 2

174

32%

LEVEL 3

224

41%

LEVEL 4

92

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

324
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

74

13%

LEVEL 2

185

32%

LEVEL 3

222

38%

LEVEL 4

102

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

110

44%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

85

31%

LEVEL 3

104

38%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

166
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

98

33%

LEVEL 3

114

39%

LEVEL 4

52

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

175
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

118

38%

LEVEL 4

57

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

6

67%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

293
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

51

10%

LEVEL 2

163

32%

LEVEL 3

206

41%

LEVEL 4

87

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

302
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

68

13%

LEVEL 2

172

32%

LEVEL 3

209

39%

LEVEL 4

93

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

305
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

30

6%

LEVEL 2

139

29%

LEVEL 3

215

45%

LEVEL 4

90

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

313
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

163

32%

LEVEL 3

213

41%

LEVEL 4

100

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

27

37%

LEVEL 2

35

48%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

33

50%

LEVEL 2

22

33%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

323
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 578

LEVEL 1

73

13%

LEVEL 2

182

31%

LEVEL 3

222

38%

LEVEL 4

101

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

290
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

42

9%

LEVEL 2

149

31%

LEVEL 3

204

42%

LEVEL 4

86

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

297
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

62

12%

LEVEL 2

156

30%

LEVEL 3

203

39%

LEVEL 4

94

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

15

23%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

20

30%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

12

18%

LEVEL 2

29

43%

LEVEL 3

19

28%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.