Skip to Content
Main content

TONAWANDA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

113

25%

LEVEL 2

110

24%

LEVEL 3

133

29%

LEVEL 4

99

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

226
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

145

29%

LEVEL 2

124

25%

LEVEL 3

135

27%

LEVEL 4

91

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

55

26%

LEVEL 2

46

22%

LEVEL 3

65

31%

LEVEL 4

44

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

73

30%

LEVEL 2

64

26%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

58

24%

LEVEL 2

64

26%

LEVEL 3

68

28%

LEVEL 4

55

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

72

29%

LEVEL 2

60

24%

LEVEL 3

70

28%

LEVEL 4

46

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

10

34%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

203
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

85

22%

LEVEL 2

94

25%

LEVEL 3

117

31%

LEVEL 4

86

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

198
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

108

27%

LEVEL 2

101

25%

LEVEL 3

122

30%

LEVEL 4

76

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

13

41%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

16

41%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

8

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

226
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

53

14%

LEVEL 2

95

25%

LEVEL 3

127

34%

LEVEL 4

99

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

79

20%

LEVEL 2

101

25%

LEVEL 3

131

33%

LEVEL 4

90

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

60

74%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

66

70%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

229
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

107

24%

LEVEL 2

107

24%

LEVEL 3

130

29%

LEVEL 4

99

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

224
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

139

29%

LEVEL 2

120

25%

LEVEL 3

133

28%

LEVEL 4

91

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

66

34%

LEVEL 4

58

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

34

17%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

63

31%

LEVEL 4

56

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

93

36%

LEVEL 2

60

23%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

111

38%

LEVEL 2

73

25%

LEVEL 3

72

25%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

229
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

105

24%

LEVEL 2

110

25%

LEVEL 3

131

30%

LEVEL 4

98

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.