LACKAWANNA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

205

62%

LEVEL 2

92

28%

LEVEL 3

26

8%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

207

58%

LEVEL 2

86

24%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

98

64%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

92

59%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

107

61%

LEVEL 2

50

28%

LEVEL 3

15

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

115

58%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

138

64%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

16

7%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

119

54%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

35

65%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

37

64%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

20

51%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

39

68%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

136

53%

LEVEL 2

91

35%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

145

50%

LEVEL 2

82

28%

LEVEL 3

52

18%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

69

99%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

62

94%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

30
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

142

57%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

24

10%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

57
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

140

51%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

63

78%

LEVEL 2

16

20%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

67

83%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

19

53%

LEVEL 2

13

36%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

33

44%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

186

63%

LEVEL 2

79

27%

LEVEL 3

23

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

174

62%

LEVEL 2

61

22%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.