HAMBURG CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

454
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 743

LEVEL 1

101

14%

LEVEL 2

188

25%

LEVEL 3

256

34%

LEVEL 4

198

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

410
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 711

LEVEL 1

87

12%

LEVEL 2

214

30%

LEVEL 3

275

39%

LEVEL 4

135

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

208
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

92

27%

LEVEL 3

125

36%

LEVEL 4

83

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

180
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

40

12%

LEVEL 2

111

34%

LEVEL 3

132

40%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

246
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

54

14%

LEVEL 2

96

24%

LEVEL 3

131

33%

LEVEL 4

115

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

230
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

47

12%

LEVEL 2

103

27%

LEVEL 3

143

38%

LEVEL 4

87

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

429
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 690

LEVEL 1

86

12%

LEVEL 2

175

25%

LEVEL 3

242

35%

LEVEL 4

187

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

392
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 664

LEVEL 1

77

12%

LEVEL 2

195

29%

LEVEL 3

265

40%

LEVEL 4

127

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

430
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

48

7%

LEVEL 2

163

25%

LEVEL 3

239

37%

LEVEL 4

191

30%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

380
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

43

7%

LEVEL 2

184

30%

LEVEL 3

247

41%

LEVEL 4

133

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

53

52%

LEVEL 2

25

25%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

44

42%

LEVEL 2

30

29%

LEVEL 3

28

27%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

378
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

52

9%

LEVEL 2

143

25%

LEVEL 3

204

36%

LEVEL 4

174

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

348
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

41

7%

LEVEL 2

163

30%

LEVEL 3

236

43%

LEVEL 4

112

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

49

29%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

52

31%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

46

29%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

39

25%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.