Skip to Content
Main content

HUTH ROAD SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

91

39%

LEVEL 4

59

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

90

38%

LEVEL 4

56

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

56

41%

LEVEL 4

26

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

43

36%

LEVEL 4

26

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

35

36%

LEVEL 4

33

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

32

27%

LEVEL 3

47

40%

LEVEL 4

30

26%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

76

41%

LEVEL 4

47

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

116
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

71

39%

LEVEL 4

45

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

90

41%

LEVEL 4

59

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

89

40%

LEVEL 4

56

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

148
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

90

40%

LEVEL 4

58

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

143
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

87

38%

LEVEL 4

56

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

44

25%

LEVEL 3

73

42%

LEVEL 4

49

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

50

28%

LEVEL 3

71

40%

LEVEL 4

47

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

18

31%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

19

33%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.