Skip to Content
Main content

KAEGEBEIN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

37

16%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

77

33%

LEVEL 4

46

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

39

16%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

94

38%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

37

33%

LEVEL 3

36

32%

LEVEL 4

27

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

45

38%

LEVEL 4

19

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

39

32%

LEVEL 3

41

33%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

31

24%

LEVEL 3

49

38%

LEVEL 4

26

20%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

30

15%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

41

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

117
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

80

40%

LEVEL 4

37

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

68

32%

LEVEL 3

76

36%

LEVEL 4

46

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

89

41%

LEVEL 4

44

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

16

64%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

17

57%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

119
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

35

16%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

75

33%

LEVEL 4

44

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

136
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

92

38%

LEVEL 4

44

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

38

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

68

39%

LEVEL 4

40

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

17

23%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

25

34%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

20

27%

LEVEL 2

23

31%

LEVEL 3

26

35%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

138
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

94

39%

LEVEL 4

44

18%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.