VERONICA E CONNOR MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

50

16%

LEVEL 2

81

27%

LEVEL 3

100

33%

LEVEL 4

73

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

92

28%

LEVEL 3

120

36%

LEVEL 4

73

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

42

30%

LEVEL 3

48

34%

LEVEL 4

35

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

56

35%

LEVEL 4

39

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

38

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

41

24%

LEVEL 3

64

38%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

7

64%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

85

33%

LEVEL 4

70

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

171
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

76

27%

LEVEL 3

106

38%

LEVEL 4

65

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

70

26%

LEVEL 3

96

36%

LEVEL 4

71

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

77

27%

LEVEL 3

117

41%

LEVEL 4

72

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

21

55%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

28

60%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

171
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

79

26%

LEVEL 3

98

33%

LEVEL 4

73

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

74

32%

LEVEL 4

67

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

65

25%

LEVEL 3

100

39%

LEVEL 4

63

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

19

26%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

26

36%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

18

24%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

20

27%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.