GRAND ISLAND CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

446
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 774

LEVEL 1

109

14%

LEVEL 2

219

28%

LEVEL 3

268

35%

LEVEL 4

178

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

478
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 814

LEVEL 1

107

13%

LEVEL 2

229

28%

LEVEL 3

304

37%

LEVEL 4

174

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

228
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

118

30%

LEVEL 3

140

36%

LEVEL 4

88

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

228
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

125

31%

LEVEL 3

144

36%

LEVEL 4

84

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

218
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

63

16%

LEVEL 2

101

26%

LEVEL 3

128

34%

LEVEL 4

90

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

250
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

61

15%

LEVEL 2

104

25%

LEVEL 3

160

39%

LEVEL 4

90

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

24
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

16

41%

LEVEL 4

8

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

29
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

12

20%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

17

29%

LEVEL 4

12

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

5

15%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

15

45%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

16

42%

LEVEL 4

8

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

386
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 652

LEVEL 1

82

13%

LEVEL 2

184

28%

LEVEL 3

228

35%

LEVEL 4

158

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

404
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 666

LEVEL 1

76

11%

LEVEL 2

186

28%

LEVEL 3

257

39%

LEVEL 4

147

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

17

47%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

10

28%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

12

33%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

438
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 696

LEVEL 1

62

9%

LEVEL 2

196

28%

LEVEL 3

262

38%

LEVEL 4

176

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

467
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 724

LEVEL 1

54

7%

LEVEL 2

203

28%

LEVEL 3

295

41%

LEVEL 4

172

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

47

60%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

53

59%

LEVEL 2

26

29%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

438
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 752

LEVEL 1

105

14%

LEVEL 2

209

28%

LEVEL 3

263

35%

LEVEL 4

175

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

472
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 794

LEVEL 1

99

12%

LEVEL 2

223

28%

LEVEL 3

299

38%

LEVEL 4

173

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

353
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

61

11%

LEVEL 2

157

27%

LEVEL 3

199

35%

LEVEL 4

154

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

389
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 608

LEVEL 1

57

9%

LEVEL 2

162

27%

LEVEL 3

239

39%

LEVEL 4

150

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

48

24%

LEVEL 2

62

31%

LEVEL 3

69

34%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

50

24%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

65

32%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

477
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 807

LEVEL 1

104

13%

LEVEL 2

226

28%

LEVEL 3

304

38%

LEVEL 4

173

21%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.