Skip to Content
Main content

IROQUOIS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

277
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

72

15%

LEVEL 2

118

25%

LEVEL 3

168

36%

LEVEL 4

109

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

63

14%

LEVEL 2

123

27%

LEVEL 3

164

36%

LEVEL 4

110

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

85

38%

LEVEL 4

38

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

77

36%

LEVEL 4

47

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

154
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

50

20%

LEVEL 3

83

34%

LEVEL 4

71

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

57

23%

LEVEL 3

87

36%

LEVEL 4

63

26%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

260
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

67

15%

LEVEL 2

115

26%

LEVEL 3

155

35%

LEVEL 4

105

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

263
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

57

13%

LEVEL 2

118

27%

LEVEL 3

157

36%

LEVEL 4

106

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

80%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

100

26%

LEVEL 3

154

40%

LEVEL 4

104

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

105

27%

LEVEL 3

151

40%

LEVEL 4

100

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

41

53%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

37

47%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

235
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

39

11%

LEVEL 2

91

25%

LEVEL 3

134

37%

LEVEL 4

101

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

239
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

92

25%

LEVEL 3

141

39%

LEVEL 4

98

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

33

32%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

34

33%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

28

30%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.