EDEN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

58

18%

LEVEL 2

85

26%

LEVEL 3

108

33%

LEVEL 4

80

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

55

16%

LEVEL 2

104

31%

LEVEL 3

106

31%

LEVEL 4

75

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

25

18%

LEVEL 2

30

21%

LEVEL 3

52

37%

LEVEL 4

33

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

53

36%

LEVEL 4

33

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

55

29%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

47

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

42

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

177
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

47

16%

LEVEL 2

76

25%

LEVEL 3

103

34%

LEVEL 4

74

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

95

30%

LEVEL 3

102

32%

LEVEL 4

70

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

67

24%

LEVEL 3

105

38%

LEVEL 4

78

28%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

84

29%

LEVEL 3

102

36%

LEVEL 4

73

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

34

60%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

27

51%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

61

24%

LEVEL 3

87

35%

LEVEL 4

65

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

85

35%

LEVEL 4

61

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

19

24%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

21

27%

LEVEL 4

15

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

23

24%

LEVEL 2

36

38%

LEVEL 3

21

22%

LEVEL 4

14

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.