DEPEW UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

93

24%

LEVEL 2

115

29%

LEVEL 3

115

29%

LEVEL 4

69

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

124

28%

LEVEL 2

134

30%

LEVEL 3

135

30%

LEVEL 4

56

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

53

29%

LEVEL 3

55

30%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

58

28%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

53

26%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

49

23%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

39

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

66

27%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

82

34%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

168
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

76

22%

LEVEL 2

98

29%

LEVEL 3

105

31%

LEVEL 4

63

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

171
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

94

25%

LEVEL 2

113

30%

LEVEL 3

121

32%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

109

35%

LEVEL 4

67

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

70

18%

LEVEL 2

127

33%

LEVEL 3

132

34%

LEVEL 4

56

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

56

72%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

54

84%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

182
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

89

23%

LEVEL 2

114

30%

LEVEL 3

113

29%

LEVEL 4

69

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

188
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

118

27%

LEVEL 2

133

30%

LEVEL 3

132

30%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

76

37%

LEVEL 4

44

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

40

17%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

82

35%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

62

34%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

39

21%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

84

39%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

189
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

122

27%

LEVEL 2

133

30%

LEVEL 3

134

30%

LEVEL 4

55

12%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

182
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

91

24%

LEVEL 2

114

29%

LEVEL 3

113

29%

LEVEL 4

69

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

189
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

121

27%

LEVEL 2

133

30%

LEVEL 3

133

30%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.