CHEEKTOWAGA-MARYVALE UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

304
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

185

28%

LEVEL 2

162

25%

LEVEL 3

189

29%

LEVEL 4

115

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 679

LEVEL 1

191

28%

LEVEL 2

192

28%

LEVEL 3

188

28%

LEVEL 4

108

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

87

29%

LEVEL 2

75

25%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

53

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

84

28%

LEVEL 2

92

31%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

164
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

98

28%

LEVEL 2

87

25%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

62

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

176
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

107

28%

LEVEL 2

100

26%

LEVEL 3

116

30%

LEVEL 4

60

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

18
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

12

38%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

14

35%

LEVEL 4

9

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

235
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

110

23%

LEVEL 2

128

27%

LEVEL 3

148

31%

LEVEL 4

87

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

231
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

119

24%

LEVEL 2

137

28%

LEVEL 3

146

30%

LEVEL 4

85

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

39

51%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

44

53%

LEVEL 2

20

24%

LEVEL 3

15

18%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

17

49%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

13

36%

LEVEL 2

14

39%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

121

21%

LEVEL 2

146

26%

LEVEL 3

184

33%

LEVEL 4

114

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

115

20%

LEVEL 2

176

31%

LEVEL 3

179

31%

LEVEL 4

106

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

64

74%

LEVEL 2

16

19%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

76

74%

LEVEL 2

16

16%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

298
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 597

LEVEL 1

146

24%

LEVEL 2

153

26%

LEVEL 3

184

31%

LEVEL 4

114

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

285
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 608

LEVEL 1

143

24%

LEVEL 2

180

30%

LEVEL 3

178

29%

LEVEL 4

107

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

39

72%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

48

68%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

65

24%

LEVEL 3

102

38%

LEVEL 4

64

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

176
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

43

14%

LEVEL 2

87

28%

LEVEL 3

108

35%

LEVEL 4

68

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

148

39%

LEVEL 2

97

25%

LEVEL 3

87

23%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

148

40%

LEVEL 2

105

28%

LEVEL 3

80

21%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

295
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 671

LEVEL 1

186

28%

LEVEL 2

190

28%

LEVEL 3

188

28%

LEVEL 4

107

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.