PFC WILLIAM J GRABIARZ #79 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

191

54%

LEVEL 2

91

26%

LEVEL 3

41

12%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

218

55%

LEVEL 2

87

22%

LEVEL 3

56

14%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

81

53%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

17

11%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

91

54%

LEVEL 2

37

22%

LEVEL 3

24

14%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

110

55%

LEVEL 2

52

26%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

127

56%

LEVEL 2

50

22%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

19

58%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

29

42%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

33

47%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

90

62%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

9

6%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

102

65%

LEVEL 2

32

21%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

41

52%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

56

54%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

90

40%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

109

42%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

101

78%

LEVEL 2

20

15%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

109

79%

LEVEL 2

16

12%

LEVEL 3

10

7%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

71
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

151

49%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

40

13%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

87
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

178

52%

LEVEL 2

77

23%

LEVEL 3

53

15%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

40

87%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

40

75%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

12

29%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

26

50%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

179

57%

LEVEL 2

77

25%

LEVEL 3

33

11%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

192

56%

LEVEL 2

77

22%

LEVEL 3

46

13%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

67
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

185

55%

LEVEL 2

86

25%

LEVEL 3

38

11%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

85
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

212

56%

LEVEL 2

84

22%

LEVEL 3

52

14%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.