BENNETT PARK MONTESSORI SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

211

69%

LEVEL 2

57

19%

LEVEL 3

33

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

225

65%

LEVEL 2

67

19%

LEVEL 3

36

10%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

97

66%

LEVEL 2

32

22%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

96

62%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

114

71%

LEVEL 2

25

16%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

129

69%

LEVEL 2

28

15%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

20

41%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

18

36%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

14

28%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

162

76%

LEVEL 2

35

16%

LEVEL 3

14

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

177

76%

LEVEL 2

35

15%

LEVEL 3

16

7%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

21

75%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

22

69%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

124

58%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

111

52%

LEVEL 2

61

28%

LEVEL 3

30

14%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

87

92%

LEVEL 2

6

6%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

114

88%

LEVEL 2

6

5%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

52
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

219

65%

LEVEL 2

66

20%

LEVEL 3

36

11%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

34

48%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

29

42%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

177

75%

LEVEL 2

35

15%

LEVEL 3

20

8%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

196

71%

LEVEL 2

51

19%

LEVEL 3

20

7%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

38
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

199

68%

LEVEL 2

55

19%

LEVEL 3

32

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

50
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

215

65%

LEVEL 2

66

20%

LEVEL 3

35

11%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

12

80%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

10

77%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.