Skip to Content
Main content

HERMAN BADILLO BILINGUAL ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

403

83%

LEVEL 2

55

11%

LEVEL 3

27

6%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

376

80%

LEVEL 2

62

13%

LEVEL 3

26

6%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

208

84%

LEVEL 2

28

11%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

192

79%

LEVEL 2

37

15%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

195

82%

LEVEL 2

27

11%

LEVEL 3

17

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

184

81%

LEVEL 2

25

11%

LEVEL 3

15

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

24

73%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

19

61%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

367

84%

LEVEL 2

46

11%

LEVEL 3

23

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

342

83%

LEVEL 2

54

13%

LEVEL 3

17

4%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

26
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

287

80%

LEVEL 2

45

13%

LEVEL 3

23

6%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

27
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

273

77%

LEVEL 2

54

15%

LEVEL 3

23

6%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

116

89%

LEVEL 2

10

8%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

103

90%

LEVEL 2

8

7%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

105

63%

LEVEL 2

39

23%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

105

63%

LEVEL 2

40

24%

LEVEL 3

19

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

298

93%

LEVEL 2

16

5%

LEVEL 3

6

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

271

90%

LEVEL 2

22

7%

LEVEL 3

7

2%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

18

78%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

15

56%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

385

83%

LEVEL 2

52

11%

LEVEL 3

25

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

361

82%

LEVEL 2

56

13%

LEVEL 3

21

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

28
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

350

81%

LEVEL 2

54

13%

LEVEL 3

25

6%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

30
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

351

79%

LEVEL 2

61

14%

LEVEL 3

26

6%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

53

95%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

25

96%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.