Skip to Content
Main content

PS 69 HOUGHTON ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

119

43%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

56

20%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

148

47%

LEVEL 2

85

27%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

54

42%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

73

50%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

65

44%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

75

45%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

24

14%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

13

54%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

14

47%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

7

26%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

10

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

34
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

31

34%

LEVEL 2

26

29%

LEVEL 3

23

25%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

35

38%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

62

50%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

70

53%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

12

55%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

22

65%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

64

32%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

83

37%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

55

71%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

65

70%

LEVEL 2

17

18%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

82
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

117

43%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

81
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

139

46%

LEVEL 2

82

27%

LEVEL 3

50

17%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

11

30%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

20

44%

LEVEL 2

14

31%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

108

45%

LEVEL 2

60

25%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

128

47%

LEVEL 2

71

26%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.