LORRAINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

182

44%

LEVEL 2

105

25%

LEVEL 3

80

19%

LEVEL 4

46

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

214

46%

LEVEL 2

121

26%

LEVEL 3

81

17%

LEVEL 4

51

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

82

45%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

92

44%

LEVEL 2

54

26%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

100

43%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

122

47%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

9

36%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

50

32%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

36

23%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

59

36%

LEVEL 2

43

26%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

86

57%

LEVEL 2

30

20%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

102

59%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

15

9%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

31

47%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

34

43%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

118

39%

LEVEL 2

84

27%

LEVEL 3

68

22%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

133

39%

LEVEL 2

95

28%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

64

60%

LEVEL 2

21

20%

LEVEL 3

12

11%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

81

63%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

125
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

170

43%

LEVEL 2

103

26%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

132
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

200

45%

LEVEL 2

115

26%

LEVEL 3

81

18%

LEVEL 4

51

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

12

80%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

36

32%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

27

24%

LEVEL 4

18

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

28

31%

LEVEL 2

22

25%

LEVEL 3

21

24%

LEVEL 4

18

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

146

48%

LEVEL 2

75

25%

LEVEL 3

53

18%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

186

49%

LEVEL 2

99

26%

LEVEL 3

60

16%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

123
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

173

43%

LEVEL 2

104

26%

LEVEL 3

78

20%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

132
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

206

45%

LEVEL 2

117

26%

LEVEL 3

81

18%

LEVEL 4

51

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.