Skip to Content
Main content

BILINGUAL CENTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

254

74%

LEVEL 2

59

17%

LEVEL 3

26

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

219

72%

LEVEL 2

52

17%

LEVEL 3

27

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

138

76%

LEVEL 2

27

15%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

110

73%

LEVEL 2

24

16%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

116

72%

LEVEL 2

32

20%

LEVEL 3

12

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

109

72%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

13

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

20

45%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

17

44%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

20

87%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

15

83%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

212

79%

LEVEL 2

39

14%

LEVEL 3

17

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

185

77%

LEVEL 2

34

14%

LEVEL 3

19

8%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

182

71%

LEVEL 2

51

20%

LEVEL 3

21

8%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

29
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

158

68%

LEVEL 2

46

20%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

72

85%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

61

87%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

86

57%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

31
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

70

54%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

26

20%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

168

88%

LEVEL 2

17

9%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

149

86%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

18

55%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

236

76%

LEVEL 2

53

17%

LEVEL 3

19

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

211

74%

LEVEL 2

48

17%

LEVEL 3

23

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

27
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

202

71%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

23

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

32
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

209

72%

LEVEL 2

50

17%

LEVEL 3

27

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

52

90%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

10

83%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.