SWEET HOME MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

117

25%

LEVEL 2

137

30%

LEVEL 3

126

27%

LEVEL 4

79

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

120

27%

LEVEL 2

114

26%

LEVEL 3

121

28%

LEVEL 4

84

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

47

21%

LEVEL 2

60

27%

LEVEL 3

75

34%

LEVEL 4

38

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

48

23%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

68

33%

LEVEL 4

39

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

70

29%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

72

31%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

45

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

11

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

14

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

151
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

50

18%

LEVEL 2

83

29%

LEVEL 3

93

33%

LEVEL 4

58

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

152
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

45

17%

LEVEL 2

70

26%

LEVEL 3

91

34%

LEVEL 4

61

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

43

48%

LEVEL 2

25

28%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

52

54%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

12

38%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

77

19%

LEVEL 2

134

32%

LEVEL 3

125

30%

LEVEL 4

78

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

86

22%

LEVEL 2

110

28%

LEVEL 3

121

30%

LEVEL 4

82

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

40

89%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

34

85%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

196
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

99

24%

LEVEL 2

126

30%

LEVEL 3

118

28%

LEVEL 4

78

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

204
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

104

25%

LEVEL 2

109

26%

LEVEL 3

120

29%

LEVEL 4

84

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

18

47%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

16

73%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

55

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

48

25%

LEVEL 3

64

33%

LEVEL 4

58

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

88

36%

LEVEL 2

79

32%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

95

39%

LEVEL 2

66

27%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.