Skip to Content
Main content

MAPLE EAST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

34

15%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

113

49%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

30

14%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

116

53%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

56

52%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

36

35%

LEVEL 4

48

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

19

15%

LEVEL 3

35

28%

LEVEL 4

57

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

13

11%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

68

59%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

6

75%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

8

57%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

20

51%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

35
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

28

72%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

86

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

25

16%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

75

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

32

15%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

110

50%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

25

12%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

114

55%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

178
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

112

51%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

173
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

28

13%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

112

54%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

169
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

29

14%

LEVEL 3

63

30%

LEVEL 4

106

51%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

112

58%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

7

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

14

52%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.