HEIM MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

103

27%

LEVEL 3

129

34%

LEVEL 4

98

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

90

24%

LEVEL 3

129

35%

LEVEL 4

109

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

46

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

37

21%

LEVEL 3

67

37%

LEVEL 4

51

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

131
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

62

28%

LEVEL 3

79

36%

LEVEL 4

52

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

62

32%

LEVEL 4

58

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

6

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

8

40%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

22

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

46
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

19

31%

LEVEL 4

27

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

84

30%

LEVEL 3

100

35%

LEVEL 4

65

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

169
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

99

37%

LEVEL 4

70

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

95

27%

LEVEL 3

124

35%

LEVEL 4

98

28%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

84

25%

LEVEL 3

125

37%

LEVEL 4

108

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

13

50%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

21

66%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

221
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

95

26%

LEVEL 3

124

34%

LEVEL 4

97

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

232
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

87

24%

LEVEL 3

123

35%

LEVEL 4

109

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

82

26%

LEVEL 3

121

38%

LEVEL 4

85

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

212
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

77

24%

LEVEL 3

111

35%

LEVEL 4

101

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

17

29%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

13

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

18

32%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

18

32%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.