CASEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

68

19%

LEVEL 3

120

33%

LEVEL 4

139

39%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

44

12%

LEVEL 2

72

20%

LEVEL 3

125

34%

LEVEL 4

122

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

33

19%

LEVEL 3

67

39%

LEVEL 4

60

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

37

21%

LEVEL 3

59

34%

LEVEL 4

59

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

132
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

79

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

66

35%

LEVEL 4

63

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

9

53%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

49
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

15

26%

LEVEL 4

34

59%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

48
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

15

27%

LEVEL 4

33

59%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

176
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

47

20%

LEVEL 3

86

36%

LEVEL 4

90

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

55

22%

LEVEL 3

94

38%

LEVEL 4

73

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

6

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

8

40%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

6

23%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

65

19%

LEVEL 3

117

34%

LEVEL 4

138

41%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

64

19%

LEVEL 3

121

36%

LEVEL 4

120

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

13

65%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

14

50%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

256
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

66

19%

LEVEL 3

118

34%

LEVEL 4

138

39%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

241
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

69

20%

LEVEL 3

123

36%

LEVEL 4

118

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

236
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

56

18%

LEVEL 3

106

34%

LEVEL 4

130

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

217
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

59

20%

LEVEL 3

113

38%

LEVEL 4

104

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

20

32%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

18

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.