Skip to Content
Main content

AMHERST CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

624
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,000

LEVEL 1

140

14%

LEVEL 2

236

24%

LEVEL 3

312

31%

LEVEL 4

312

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

618
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,000

LEVEL 1

128

13%

LEVEL 2

254

25%

LEVEL 3

307

31%

LEVEL 4

311

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

322
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

68

14%

LEVEL 2

109

22%

LEVEL 3

165

33%

LEVEL 4

157

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

305
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

57

12%

LEVEL 2

127

26%

LEVEL 3

139

28%

LEVEL 4

166

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

302
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

72

14%

LEVEL 2

127

25%

LEVEL 3

147

29%

LEVEL 4

155

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

313
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

71

14%

LEVEL 2

127

25%

LEVEL 3

168

33%

LEVEL 4

145

28%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

26
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

7

16%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

17

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

30
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

17

37%

LEVEL 4

13

28%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

61
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

28

33%

LEVEL 4

33

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

53
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

11

14%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

20

26%

LEVEL 4

33

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

478
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 701

LEVEL 1

75

11%

LEVEL 2

148

21%

LEVEL 3

229

33%

LEVEL 4

249

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

485
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 707

LEVEL 1

58

8%

LEVEL 2

164

23%

LEVEL 3

236

33%

LEVEL 4

249

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

49

37%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

35

27%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

46

35%

LEVEL 2

51

39%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

612
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 911

LEVEL 1

86

9%

LEVEL 2

213

23%

LEVEL 3

302

33%

LEVEL 4

310

34%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

603
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 904

LEVEL 1

75

8%

LEVEL 2

226

25%

LEVEL 3

296

33%

LEVEL 4

307

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

54

61%

LEVEL 2

23

26%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

53

55%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

596
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 933

LEVEL 1

125

13%

LEVEL 2

212

23%

LEVEL 3

296

32%

LEVEL 4

300

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

594
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 929

LEVEL 1

101

11%

LEVEL 2

234

25%

LEVEL 3

293

32%

LEVEL 4

301

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

28
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

15

22%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

12

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

27

38%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

494
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 679

LEVEL 1

53

8%

LEVEL 2

132

19%

LEVEL 3

233

34%

LEVEL 4

261

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

470
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

38

6%

LEVEL 2

143

22%

LEVEL 3

226

35%

LEVEL 4

244

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

87

27%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

79

25%

LEVEL 4

51

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

90

26%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

81

23%

LEVEL 4

67

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.