Skip to Content
Main content

SMALLWOOD DRIVE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

58

19%

LEVEL 3

90

30%

LEVEL 4

131

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

66

23%

LEVEL 3

97

33%

LEVEL 4

109

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

71

45%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

34

24%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

62

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

30

21%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

60

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

32

21%

LEVEL 3

59

39%

LEVEL 4

47

31%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

8

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

6

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

183
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

72

29%

LEVEL 4

111

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

53

22%

LEVEL 3

83

34%

LEVEL 4

96

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

50

18%

LEVEL 3

88

31%

LEVEL 4

130

46%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

57

22%

LEVEL 3

93

35%

LEVEL 4

106

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

10

48%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

191
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

42

17%

LEVEL 3

76

31%

LEVEL 4

115

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

48

21%

LEVEL 3

76

34%

LEVEL 4

92

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

16

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

10

15%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

21

32%

LEVEL 4

17

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.