GAYHEAD SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

74

19%

LEVEL 2

122

32%

LEVEL 3

122

32%

LEVEL 4

62

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

92

20%

LEVEL 2

136

30%

LEVEL 3

114

25%

LEVEL 4

107

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

30

17%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

33

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

34

16%

LEVEL 2

73

35%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

53

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

44

21%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

58

24%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

64

27%

LEVEL 4

54

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

8

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

8

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

102

34%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

180
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

93

27%

LEVEL 4

87

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

9

47%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

14

30%

LEVEL 2

16

35%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

18

29%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

46

14%

LEVEL 2

106

32%

LEVEL 3

118

36%

LEVEL 4

62

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

47

12%

LEVEL 2

118

31%

LEVEL 3

110

29%

LEVEL 4

107

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

28

58%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

45

67%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

58

18%

LEVEL 2

102

32%

LEVEL 3

105

33%

LEVEL 4

58

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

198
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

72

19%

LEVEL 2

108

29%

LEVEL 3

99

26%

LEVEL 4

99

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

16

28%

LEVEL 2

20

35%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

20

28%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.